Discussion - Interpretation of the Generalization and Specialization Hierarchy
- Due Jun 2, 2024 by 11:59pm
- Points 25
- Submitting a discussion post
- Available May 27, 2024 at 12am - Jun 3, 2024 at 11:59pm
At this point, you should have read chapters one through five in the textbook. Also, you should have reviewed the lecture notes and material in the class announcements. Based on this material give your interpretation of the following.
In your own words, describe and share with the class your interpretation of the generalization and specialization hierarchy?
Also
Review the following links before making your contribution
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/dbms/dbms_generalization_aggregation.htm Links to an external site.
When replying to discussion assignments, there are a few guidelines to follow.
Students must reply across multiple days during the start date and Due Date that the discussion assignment was published. Students should not make multiple comments on a single day or at the last minute. The purpose of discussion assignments is to have an asynchronous chat or discussion on specific topics. If students wait until the last minute to participate in discussion assignments, the entire class does not have an opportunity to review submissions and share them with the class. As a result of this, points will be deducted from discussion assignment grades that do not contribute to the discussion across multiple days that the discussion assignment has been published.
Students must be specific in their replies to other students. For example, students must specify what they agree with or like about another student’s submission to the discussion. Inversely, if a student is in disagreement with another student’s submission to the discussion, the students must specify what they disagree with or dislike about the other student’s submission to the discussion. As a result of this, points will be deducted from discussion assignment grades for students that do not reply to other students with clear and concise replies detailing the positive or negative aspects of the other student's submission.